my eyes! the goggles do nothing!

[sigma7]

Angels with Attitude part two: BeckyCarter.com.

Comments

[iamthemoon.livejournal.com]

I don't even get what the hell this is!!

[sigma7.livejournal.com]

I think it's "Glamour Shots" for overpossessive and overaffluent and possibly myopic parents.

[iamthemoon.livejournal.com]

Myopic?

[sigma7.livejournal.com]

Yeah, I'm thinking that maybe they can't see the level of detail that's now missing from their Photoshopped-into-oblivion children. Otherwise they'd be freaking out about their soulless faces and vacant eyes. Maybe they need the faces abstracted to the point where they can recognize them....

[neonnurse.livejournal.com]

These remind me of the postcard photos of dead children that used to be a staple for the traveling photographer, back in the frontier and early settlement days. Sometimes the body had been stored for a time specifically to be able to get a picture, and it showed in the pale, extra smooth, unmoving features with large sunked (closed) eyes.

The difference is, I can understand the parents of 100 years ago wanting some small tangible souvenir. The people who pay for these I can't understand at all.

[aota.livejournal.com]

yuck! They look like Barbies with all the personality removed.

[kitblonde.livejournal.com]

Oh lord, save me from their dead-eyed stares.
Poor kids. This is why there should be tests given to people before they're allowed to have kids.

Question one: Do you think beauty pageants for little girls are a good idea?
If you answered yes, swallow the blue pill. By the time you wake up, your ovaries will be on their way to someone who deserves them.

[mammal.livejournal.com]

I actually thought they were Barbies, or some sort of weird collectible doll, at first. I wasn't completely sure they were live people until I looked at the makeup page.

"Please make sure your child's face is completely free of makeup and debris." WTF?