Well, they both have four letters....

Big trouble at the New York Times Magazine this morning, as an editors' note reveals that one of the women who appeared in last week's cover story on female Iraq veterans never served in Iraq and might have made up much of what she told reporter Sara Corbett in her interview.

In the original article, 27-year-old Amorita Randall claimed to have been stationed in Iraq during 2004. She also said that she suffered a brain injury during a roadside attack, in which her Humvee was hit by an I.E.D. Today, the Times writes that, "Based on the information that came to light after the article was printed, it is now clear that Ms. Randall did not serve in Iraq, but may have become convinced she did."

A few post-publication revelations seem to have revealed that while Randall stands by her story, official Navy records show that she was not in Iraq, but Guam.

On the lighter side, re: BSG, would it have killed them to at least use the Dylan version? Or Hendrix? C'mon.