The beginning of the end

[sigma7]

South Dakota Gov. Mike Rounds signed a bill Monday that bans nearly all abortions in the state, legislation in direct conflict with the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion in 1973.

...Although the law -- intended as a constitutional challenge to Roe v. Wade -- is set to take effect July 1, Rounds said in the statement that he expects legal action will prevent that. He added that a settlement of the issue could take years and might ultimately be decided by the nation's highest court.

Yep, if you're raped in South Dakota and get pregnant, they want you raising the rapist's child.

It's not that I'm particularly pro-life or pro-choice. It's just that anything that mathematically decreases the odds of another Paris Hilton or Bill Romanowski being born is a good thing to me.

Comments

[rainfletcher.livejournal.com]

Hmm, how long d'you reckon before every miscarriage is followed up by a criminal investigation for possible murder charges?

When I hear stories like this, I fear deeply for my baby girl. What kind of world did we just let her into?

[sigma7.livejournal.com]

Closer than you might think. And this is pre-abortion ban.

[paradisacorbasi.livejournal.com]

Last year in Virginia someone did attempt to make that a law.

[robing.livejournal.com]

Without getting into a discussion of pro-life vs. pro-choice, I'm not sure there's any particular evidence that children of rapists grow up to be rapists or are in any way bad people as adults. I know that there's a cycle of violence in which abused children grow up to be abusers, but I'm not sure that that holds true for rapists as well, particularly if the rapist in question has no contact with the child. Is there evidence of this?

[motteditor.livejournal.com]

I don't think that's the point, though. Why should a woman who's been raped be forced to bear a child that arrives from that violation to term if she doesn't wish to? It's just compounding the initial trauma.

[robing.livejournal.com]

Well, I was responding specifically to what Sigma said about "anything that decreases the odds of another Paris Hilton" etc.

I guess my only response to your question is a question: Why should a child be aborted just because his dad (or even mom, I guess) was a rapist? The child isn't guilty of a crime. From a certain perspective, the child would be a victim as well.

What if the situation involved a woman who raped a man in order to get pregnant? (This is probably highly unlikely, but I'm going to go with it.) Would the man be allowed to demand the woman have an abortion because the offspring's existence was traumatic to him?

[sigma7.livejournal.com]

No, nothing against the children who're the product of rapes -- but more the fact that a woman would conceivably be legally required to bring this child to term, a child she may not want any part of, and hell, it's not out of the question (as someone mentioned in another thread somewhere) that the rapist could sue for custody.

I just think that's a lot to ask of any woman.

It's a moral minefield, no doubt. I still stick to my stance on the "fewer people = better" argument.

[adele87.livejournal.com]

I'm pro-choice and I think that this is stupid.

...I guess that's when you drive to another state for the abortion, then.

[adele87.livejournal.com]

I fail to see how teenage sex is illegal. It's THEIR body, for crying out loud.

[adele87.livejournal.com]

What if the situation involved a woman who raped a man in order to get pregnant? (This is probably highly unlikely, but I'm going to go with it.)

I actually know a man who was raped by a woman because she wanted to get pregnant.

[paradisacorbasi.livejournal.com]

In the case of teenagers, it's because of age of consent.

True adults can take advantage of teenagers who may not recognize or realize the consequences of their actions.

Like all those 13 year olds who end up on Rikki Lake wanting to be mothers, and then go through "Baby, Think It Over" and decide, "No. Not ready yet" afterward.

[paradisacorbasi.livejournal.com]

The child is doomed to a traumatic existence too, if the birth parents are in any way involved.

The mother will resent the child's existence [even if she somehow still loves the child because the child is hers] due to the fact that the child is a walking reminder.

And I don't even want to think what kind of messed up upbringing it'd be for a child growing up with the rapist father who sued his victim for custody and got it.

[adele87.livejournal.com]

Wait a muinite, you mean people over 18 right?

There are plenty of people that are mentally "ready" to have sex so I don't swee the problem, but ah well.

[paradisacorbasi.livejournal.com]

Yeah.

And while there may be 13 year olds who are mentally and emotionally ready to have sex and deal with it on an adult level, the vast majority of kids that age are still kids. Which is where the problem is.

The few who are advanced for their age cannot be the example by which the law operates, because we'd have pregnant 8 -13 year olds who couldn't handle it, even though you'd get one or two who were completely able to cope.

[adele87.livejournal.com]

OH OK...sorry, I thought you ment something else.

I agree that 13 year olds shouldn't be having sex, but for some reason I had a moment when you said "teenagers" and thought you were including 18 year olds in that. Oi. My it's been a long day...

[motteditor.livejournal.com]

As Sig said, it's nothing against the child, but I definitely believe the living mother's rights and feelings supercede the mass of cells'.

The latter situation's certainly a tricky one. A man shouldn't be allowed to demand a woman have an abortion, but at the same time ... it's no fairer to him to have a child running around than it is to force a woman to bear one. I can't say what I would think in that situation.

[bishop282.livejournal.com]

I think it's too early to take a charge at Roe. There needs to be one more person on the court who can read the Constitution and not get vibes from emanations of a penumbra. Fortunately, for those who who still want to kill their babies, Molly Saves The Day (what a wrong blog title for this case) has a DIY set of instructions (http://mollysavestheday.blogspot.com/2006/02/for-women-of-south-dakota-abortion.html) for the women of South Dakota. The most disturbing part is the matter of fact way the commenters discuss it, like they're sharing recipes.

The abortion trend is promising in South Dakota already, through laws and stigma (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/26/AR2005122600747.html).

Molly?

[taelech.livejournal.com]

Bish, thats not Molly from 3rd south at WSU is it?

Re: Molly?

[bishop282.livejournal.com]

Not sure. I went back to Molly's site and there is nothing in her information about location. That Molly is a very bitter and angry person.

Not sure if we're thinking of the same Molly, but I'm now singing the two songs that I remember hearing at Craig's for a Molly at WSU. One to the tune of "New Age Girl" and the other to School House Rock's adverb song.