Date: 2008-06-04 04:05 pm (UTC)
I have two words as to why Obama should not even offer VP to Clinton:

Vince. Foster.

Personally, I like Sebelius as Veep. She gave the rebuttal to the SotU speech (much like Obama's keynote at the DNC), she's done a pretty good job as governor, and she's done it without throwing hissy-fits to the press. Plus, she's squeeky-clean as politicians go. Wesley Clark would be a smart choice but not one that I'd like, for the same reason that you can forget about Edwards: they're simply incompatible with Obama's image of Change(tm).

For the Republicans, man, I don't know anything that can save McCain. Romney is the easy choice, since he's younger and can be trusted not to pull a Dan Quayle. If I were playing Fantasy Politics here, though, I think I'd go the other way with Ron Paul. You pick up an extremely zealous (if largely ineffective) base, and you can honestly go toe-to-toe with Obama in the Change(R) category by letting Ron's leash out a little.

What the DNC needs to figure out, and figure out now, is that Hillary Clinton is about as likeable as a Chlymidia-infested Roger Clemens-skunk love child with leprosy. She's a cancer to the Democrat Party and the very concept of representative government.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

.

Profile

sigma7: Sims (Default)
sigma7

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags