First Ron Jeremy swung by Manhattan, giving the town a thrill and
missmiah a playful grope. Or something. I wasn't there, so I can't testify specifically.
Then students march in protest of the newspaper adviser. Wow. That's, uhm, great.
Note: Editor Katie Lane is one of the cutest, greatest human beings alive. Treat her right.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Then students march in protest of the newspaper adviser. Wow. That's, uhm, great.
Note: Editor Katie Lane is one of the cutest, greatest human beings alive. Treat her right.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
That said, applications for columnists sometimes fluctuated well over the positions available, but not always -- some were recruited. Most other positions required ceaseless badgering to fill, including editorships. And they get paid. Not much, but more than most places.
I think they'd stand an excellent chance of getting something printed if it was halfway decent and listened to feedback. But there've been people who never got a thing published because it was simply not good enough. They're the exceptions, though, maybe one a semester.
The problem is usually nobody applies for the positions, which usually come open around this time of year, with 4-5 weeks left in the year. Interest peaks the first week, week-and-a-half of the semester, but by that time everyone's hired and has already been working two weeks. So it's a little frustrating.
At least, this is as it was 4-5 years ago. Things may have changed, but I doubt it.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
My attitude toward the positions was mixed. On one hand, it was a good way to make sure diversity issues were covered and it allowed minorities to get involved. On the other hand, I also felt much of the minority content could be ghetto-ized (several of the diversity desks had "Diversity Pages," where they would put all their news every other week). I never had one in Jewish Affairs and would have resisted any attempt to add one, though I did do a two-page spread each year for Holocaust Memorial Week.
I think I might have ended up more charitable if some of the positions hadn't been used as much for anti-Semitic, anti-Israeli purposes.
From:
no subject
But at the same time, if it got someone to be more active and more vocal with the paper, launched a career in journalism that might not've otherwise happened, hey, that's a bonus.
And if these people were calling for change in the newspaper's content instead of oversight from faculty, that'd be constructive. This just seems punitive, and coming with the backing from the administration official whose mug in the paper accidentally got replaced with Osama bin Laden's on last September 11th.
I just don't see how their solution would solve anything.