In China, Reznor is more dispassionate: "As for the special situation in China, it does not seem to be easy to obtain Western music via legal channels, so I have the following suggestion for our fans: If you can find and buy our legal CDs, I express my thanks for your support. If you cannot find it, I think that downloading from the Internet is a more acceptable option than buying pirated CDs. Our music is easy to find on the Internet, and you might not need to spend much effort to find most of our songs. If you like our songs after you've heard them, please feel free to share it with your friends. As I have put all my effort and heart into my music, I sincerely hope that more and more people can share the enjoyment with us."

In Australia, though, where the thermo-chrome coating costs $.83 but the CD is marked up a full $10? "Has anyone seen the price come down? Okay, well, you know what that means - STEAL IT. Steal away. Steal and steal and steal some more and give it to all your friends and keep on stealin'. Because one way or another these motherfuckers will get it through their head that they're ripping people off and that that's not right."

I will say that Reznor has more faith in the cognitive skills of the corporate drone than I do.
Okay, not rly. But still.

Well, in Brisbane I end up meeting and greeting some record label people, who are pleasant enough, and one of them is a sales guy, so I say "Why is this the case?" He goes "Because your packaging is a lot more expensive". I know how much the packaging costs -- it costs me, not them, it costs me 83 cents more to have a CD with the colour-changing ink on it. I'm taking the hit on that, not them. So I said "Well, it doesn't cost $10 more". "Ah, well, you're right, it doesn't. Basically it's because we know you've got a core audience that's gonna buy whatever we put out, so we can charge more for that. It's the pop stuff we have to discount to get people to buy it. True fans will pay whatever". And I just said "That's the most insulting thing I've heard. I've garnered a core audience that you feel it's OK to rip off? F--- you'. That's also why you don't see any label people here, 'cos I said 'F--- you people. Stay out of my f---ing show. If you wanna come, pay the ticket like anyone else. F--- you guys". They're thieves. I don't blame people for stealing music if this is the kind of s--- that they pull off.


Interesting revelation: the Year Zero alternate reality game was spurred by Reznor completely apart and isolated from the record label.

Well, their response, when they saw that it did catch on like wildfire, was "Look how smart we are the way we marketed this record". That's the feedback I've gotten -- other artists who've met with that label ask 'em about it: "Yeah, you like what we did for Trent? Look what we did for Trent". They've then gone on to try to buy the company that did it to apply it to all their other acts. So, glad I could help them out. I'm sure they still don't understand what it is that we did or why it worked. But I will look forward to the Black Eyed Peas ARG, that should be amazing.

Unsurprisingly, that company, 42 Entertainment, is also responsible for the web marketing of The Dark Knight, including IBelieveInHarveyDent.com and the ever-changing IBelieveInHarveyDentToo.com, which a few days ago gave us the first glimpse of the Heath Ledger Joker.
Tags:
sigma7: Sims (gonnasuck)
( Apr. 21st, 2007 01:03 am)
Are you looking for places to live in the next fifteen years? Check out ViabilityIndex.com. Toronto scores an 8.3, Chicago a 9.1 (!), Kansas City a 6.6 ("OK, the summers are hot and drought is a problem, but groundwater supplies are mostly adequate. Good news! There are only two natural disasters you really have to worry about, tornados and the Royals. Build a cellar and watch football." Some things never change.), and Los Angeles...isn't there anymore.

Oh, and is that you, Mark Bagley?
I'm deeply intrigued by the Year Zero alternate reality game, implemented by the same people who brought us I Love Bees, and as you might expect, this time it's refined, focused, and deeply disturbing. It's right up my alley, as it turns out, being a lifelong fan of apocalyptic/dystopic future storytelling, except I think we've hit a point where the number of thresholds we have to cross to go from present-day-life to horrific-dystopia is in single digits. But Year Zero's conceit -- that a planetary "subversive" movement uncovers a quantum-computing solution to send information back in time -- feeds into the form and function of its content (websites like IAmTryingtoBelieve.com, the chilling HollywoodInMemoriam.org, and my favorite, ThePriceofTreason.net, with their presentation similarly distorted by the time-travel), and despite recently-voiced warnings of the perils of worldbuilding, I'm waiting for the storyline to unfold further. Thematically it's a perfect synthesis of the fears of the future with the anxieties of today -- it's like a shelf of Aldous Huxley, George Orwell and Robert Heinlein crashed into a TV set showing FOX News -- with just a hint of potential redemption.

Of course, this has little to do with the actual Year Zero album, but I think it clearly transcends what we'd reflexively call "viral marketing" -- this isn't sticking Lite-Brites up in Boston; the ARG has become a narrative form in and of itself. What strikes me most about all of this, though, is that for all of the issues, for its potential relevance, for all of the ideas presented in Year Zero, it will never provoke as much discussion or dialogue as those Lite-Brites in Boston promoting a movie about a lump of meat, a carton of French fries and a hedonistic milkshake. Maybe we do deserve to be overrun by tin-hat tyrants and drugged into docility. And maybe we already have. I'm not giving up on the whole human race yet; I'm just starting one person at a time.
.

Profile

sigma7: Sims (Default)
sigma7

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags